| |
|
|
|
Search
|
|
 Gila National Forest (USFS)
|
|
|
|
Return to
Op-eds Index
Don't Let Congress Give Away Our Great Outdoors
By William Wiley and Phil
Young, president and secretary of REP's New Mexico Chapter, published
December 4, 2011
in the Santa Fe
New Mexican
As
we enter the season of giving thanks and enjoying the simple pleasures
of family and friends, we believe it's also important to take a few
minutes to reflect upon not only what we have, but also what we stand
to lose.
So, as we take some time to reflect between Thanksgiving and Christmas,
we would like to consider a significant threat to New Mexico's public
lands and wild places.
Two congressional bills would eliminate protections for wide swaths of
backcountry public lands that are vital to our Western way of life.
Neither bill is consistent with the traditional conservative ethic of
stewardship exemplified by Ronald Reagan and other past leaders who
championed land protection.
The legislation includes a bill by Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., that
would remove protections from more than 60 million acres of roadless
forests and wilderness study areas. Another, by Rep. Jason Chaffetz,
R-Utah, would put 3.3 million acres of public lands up for sale.
It's hard to wrap one's head around 63 million acres. Consider this:
The entire state of New Mexico is just shy of 78 million acres — which
means we are essentially talking about an area of public lands that is
more than three-quarters of New Mexico's size at risk of losing
protection.
If the McCarthy bill becomes law, New Mexico alone stands to lose
protection for 1.6 million acres of roadless forests and more than
400,000 acres of Wilderness Study Areas. Another 800,000 acres of New
Mexico public lands would go on the auction block in a buyer's market,
heightening the risk that taxpayers would get a poor return for
unloading their assets.
As if that weren't alarming enough, bills have been proposed to weaken
the Antiquities Act — the remarkably effective law dating from Theodore
Roosevelt's time that he and 15 other presidents from both parties have
used to protect such treasures as White Sands National Monument, which
was protected in 1933 by Republican President Herbert Hoover.
All this legislation amounts to a great outdoors giveaway, at long-term
expense to the American taxpayer.
Bills weakening land protection do not follow the important principle
of balance that is essential for managing our public lands — ensuring
that a variety of important needs are met, including protecting
drinking water sources, wildlife habitat, outdoor recreation
opportunities, and scenic and historic preservation, as well as
producing timber, minerals and energy.
Extractive uses of public lands create jobs, but so does conservation.
A recent report by the nonprofit Outdoor Industry Association found
that active outdoor recreation supports 47,000 jobs, most of them
sustainable and long-term, in New Mexico and contributes $3.8 billion a
year to the state's economy. Eliminating protection of backcountry
lands puts outdoor recreation jobs at risk.
As Republicans and as conservationists, we wish to remind our
Republican leaders that good stewardship is part of what it means to be
a conservative. Ronald Reagan once said: ""What is a conservative after
all but one who conserves, one who
is committed to protecting and holding close the things by which we
live ... And we want to protect and conserve the land on which we live
— our countryside, our rivers and mountains, our plains and meadows and
forests."
What Reagan knew in his time bears repeating today. America's freedom,
prosperity and strength are inextricably bound with our backcountry
lands, where we escaped the impediments of old ways of thinking and
learned our national traits of enterprise and entrepreneurship.
So, as Americans and as New Mexicans, we all have a powerful interest
in protecting our public-lands heritage. More importantly, we can do
something about it, by contacting our congressional delegation and
telling them that we value our lands and expect our elected
representatives to be good stewards.
As we approach a new year and a fresh start, we can think of no better
gift for our nation than protecting for our children what our parents
and grandparents protected for us.
|
|
|