Contact
Jim: jdipeso@rep.org
(253) 740-2066 / 2009
Archive / 2008
Archive / 2007
Archive / 2006
Archive / 2005
Archive
Costing Out Greenhouse
Gas Emissions Reductions
February 2, 2007
The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported today that it's 90
percent sure that global warming is tied to human activities. The
observed trends – melting ice fields, rising sea levels, more extreme
temperatures, more intense droughts – are likely to get worse without
prompt action to limit greenhouse gas emissions.
Ninety
percent ought to be enough certainty to justify action, and for
rational players in the worlds of business and government, it is. There
will always be those who, in the interest of being politically correct
within their echo chambers, traipse around on self-indulgent
ideological excursions from reality. Political energies, however, would
be better spent crafting mainstream climate legislation that can get
enacted, rather than trying to convince an obdurate minority that will
brook no convincing.
That
said, what would it cost to reduce greenhouse gas emissions low enough
to stabilize the atmosphere’s carbon load at a safe level?
McKinsey
Quarterly recently published an intriguing study indicating
that costs may not be as high as many fear.
The
study estimated that carbon dioxide emissions would have to be reduced
by 26 gigatons (26 billion tons) per year by 2030 in order to stabilize
the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide concentration at 450 ppm by 2030.
(Today’s concentration is about 380 ppm.)
Nearly
25 percent of that reduction could be accomplished by energy efficiency
measures that have no net cost. The remainder of the 26-gigaton annual
reduction – expanded wind and nuclear energy development,
carbon-sequestered coal, forest preservation, for example – would cost
no more than $52 per ton. That works out to about 0.6 percent of the
world’s projected economic output in 2030.
Carbon
abatement can be viewed as a kind of insurance policy against
catastrophic climate perturbations that humanity would be ill-prepared
to cope with. The authors helpfully pointed out that all insurance
costs – excluding life insurance – amounted to 3.3 percent of gross
world product in 2005.
Seen in that context, 0.6 percent doesn't sound like a bad deal at all.