Opinions: Jim DiPeso's Blog

 

Search


Contact Jim: jdipeso@rep.org (253) 740-2066 / 2009 Archive / 2008 Archive / 2007 Archive / 2006 Archive / 2005 Archive

Hot News from Long Ago

July 24, 2009

Ever heard of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum? No, it’s not a heavy metal rock band.

The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) was a period of significant climatic warming that took place 55 million years ago. (Yes, dear climate skeptics, everyone knows there were no coal plants in operation at that time, so we cheerfully stipulate for the record that this warming episode had purely natural causes.)

A study published recently in a scholarly journal came to a startling conclusion. A surge in carbon emissions – perhaps from volcanic activity or from the breakup of undersea hydrate formations – led to a rise in global temperatures, but the emissions surge cannot explain all of the warming. (By the way, in case you’re wondering, there were no thermometers in those days. Scientists use geochemical techniques to deduce atmospheric temperatures that were extant during the PETM.)

The scientists hypothesize that something else was going on – possibly positive feedbacks that reinforced the warming forced by the carbon buildup.

The take-home message, according to one of the study’s researchers, is that dumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere could trigger atmospheric processes that would result in much greater heating than current models suggest.

Gaps in our knowledge about climate science are a double-edged sword. Climate skeptics like to assert that uncertainties always mean that climate change risks are overblown. The gaps also could mean that the risks are greater than we think.