Opinions: Jim DiPeso's Blog

 

Search



Contact Jim: jdipeso@rep.org (253) 740-2066 / 2011 Archive / 2010 Archive

Bookmark and Share

Oklahoma Energy Plan Is OK

November 29, 2011

Oklahoma is a long way from Washington, DC, which Ronald Reagan used to call the puzzle palace.

That might explain why Oklahoma’s first state energy plan, released earlier this month by Republican Governor Mary Fallin, is blessedly free of the ideological posturing and partisan cant that afflicts energy debates in the nation’s capital, to the point that an observer who didn’t know better would conclude that wind turbines are Democrats and coal-burning power plants are Republicans.

Instead, Fallin’s energy plan is a practical, balanced, mainstream strategy that sticks to the facts, maintains a civil tone, and treats energy as an integrated system in which resources—fossil and renewable—should be optimized to deliver clean, affordable, and reliable energy, not teased apart and treated in isolation, either as political favorites or whipping boys.

What did Fallin get right? Plenty.


Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin
Efficiency
Fallin treats efficiency as the foundation of an energy strategy, as it should be, since efficiency “leverages all forms of supply by stretching the value a given unit of energy supplies.” Among other things, her plan calls for using lifecycle rather than first-cost analysis to plan state capital investments, upgraded local building codes, industrial rate structures that encourage demand-side management, and clearing away obstacles—such as high standby charges—for industries to install combined heat and power systems that squeeze more value out of each unit of fuel.

Renewables
Unlike DC ideologues who rattle on about renewables as the spawn of some socialist devil, Fallin gives renewables their due. To be sure, Oklahoma has lots of wind and plenty to spare. Rodgers and Hammerstein weren’t making things up when they wrote that famous song lyric about Oklahoma’s wind. Still, it’s never a bad idea to play to your strengths. Oklahoma, already number 8 in the country in installed wind generation capacity, has barely scratched the surface of its wind development potential.

Fallin’s plan supports transmission investments to connect wind power to loads, and calls for the wind and gas industries to work together on integrated power development in which gas-fired power plants, which can be up and running quickly, could back up variable wind plants, allowing for easier integration of wind energy into the 24/7 grid. It gives a shout-out to Oklahoma’s 15 percent renewable energy target and suggests getting more ambitious as time goes on.

Oil and Gas
Oklahoma grew up as an oil state and it’s still a major oil producer, but Oklahoma’s ace in the hole is natural gas. Oklahoma in 2009 produced more than 8 percent of total U.S. gas needs, and exported two-thirds of its production to other states. With new drilling technologies making shale gas accessible, Fallin sees a huge market for gas-fired generation and transportation, which would bring her state thousands of jobs, millions in tax revenue, less pressure on rivers and lakes used for power plant cooling water, and better air quality for Oklahomans.

In tandem with the release of her plan, Fallin signed an agreement with her Colorado counterpart, John Hickenlooper, on joint procurement of natural gas-fueled fleet vehicles. Building a market for natural gas vehicles would help add some much-needed competition for oil in the transportation energy market.

Greens will find aspects of the plan to quibble with. Fallin raises concerns about the suite of air quality rules coming down the EPA pike, but steers clear of hyperventilated DC sloganeering that clean air regulations will bring on the apocalypse. In a calm voice, her plan makes a reasonable argument that the complexity of the rules and their near-term deadlines could result in “suboptimal decision-making.”

Nor does her plan mention climate change. Nevertheless, it points that capturing CO2 to coax more petroleum out of oil reservoirs would keep a lot of CO2 out of the atmosphere, as well as extend the lives of old fields.

So, what does Governor Fallin’s plan mean for people who don’t live in Oklahoma? It’s a model that Congress—if it can get beyond its dysfunctional ways—could apply for addressing national energy issues. Stick to the facts, avoid vein-throbbing rhetoric, don’t paint energy resources in ideological colors, and find ways in which all forms of energy can contribute towards providing heat, light, and motive power in ways that keep homes comfortable, people and goods on the move, energy bills reasonable, and the air and water clean. 

Nice work, Governor.