State
Home | Contact
| ISSUES
| Activities | Archive
How
Washington's GOP House delegation
did on REP's new Congressional Scorecard
Click
here
to download complete Scorecard
Dave Reichert (Mercer Island) -
97
Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Spokane) - 22
Doc Hastings (Pasco) - 8
Hanford
2010 Update:
The Washington chapter signed on to an April 29, 2010 letter
to Energy
Secretary Steven Chu urging him to withdraw Records of Decision that
select Hanford as a disposal site for large volumes of low-level
radioactive waste and mixed low-level radioactive waste.
On
March 12, 2010, the chapter filed an official comment
letter on the Department of Energy's draft Tank
Closure
and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for Hanford. The
document
examines alternatives for retrieving, treating, storing, and/or
disposing of radioactive and hazardous waste. The Washington chapter
strongly recommended that DOE eliminate consideration of shipping
offsite radioactive waste to Hanford for storage and/or processing.
Background:
Hanford, where plutonium was produced for America's nuclear arsenal, is
the most polluted place in the Western Hemisphere. The radioactive and
chemical byproducts of plutoniuim production created a huge legacy of
wastes, including nearly 500 billion gallons of wastes dumped into
unlined soil trenches; and 177 storage tanks holding 53 million gallons
of mixed radioactive and chemical wastes, at least one-third of which
have leaked.
In
1989, Washington State, the U.S. Department of Energy, and
Environmental Protection Agency signed the Tri-Party Agreement, a
binding agreement that calls for cleanup of wastes by negotiated
milestones. But poor federal management has pushed cleanup of the tanks
back repeatedly and driven up the costs. Estimated cost of the
vitrification plant to dispose of the wastes has soared past $11
billion.
In
2009, the state, Department of Energy, and EPA revised their agreement
to extend cleanup deadlines. The deadline for removing waste from
single-shell tanks was extended from 2018 to 2040, and the completion
deadline for treating tank waste was extended from 2028 to 2047.
Solution:
In 2004, Washington voters approved Initiative 297 by a 70 percent
majority. I-297 specifies that no new waste can be introduced to
Hanford until existing waste is cleaned up. The initiative has been
challenged by the federal government in court. The solution is for the
Washington Legislature to enact I-297 into law in a way that is
consistent with existing law on state jurisdiction over mixed wastes.
Click
here for a
PDF copy of the Washington Chapter's March 27, 2009, letter
to the
Department of Energy about transfers of wastes from leaking storage
tanks. Click here
for a PDF copy of the Washington Chapter's March 12,
2010 comment letter on the Department of Energy's draft Tank Closure
and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for Hanford.
Wilderness
Background: The
National Wilderness Preservation System protects pristine public lands
where, in the eloquent words of the Wilderness Act, "the earth and its
community of life are untrammelled by man, where man himself is a
visitor who does not remain." As of September 2009, the system contains
more than 109 million acres of forests, deserts, wetlands, and other
natural areas, of which nearly 4.5 million acres are in Washington. The
Evergreen State's newest wilderness area is the 106,000-acre Wild Sky
Wilderness, designated through bipartisan legislation enacted in 2008.
On
March 26,
2009, Congressman Dave Reichert, R-WA, introduced bipartisan
legislation to expand the Alpine Lakes Wilderness by 22,000 acres, or 6
percent. The bill also would designate the Pratt River and the Middle
Fork of the Snoqualmie River as wild and scenic. “What we do
today will have a lasting impact on future generations. We must do our
part to preserve land, not just in faraway places, but in our own
backyard, here in Washington State," Congressman Reichert said.
The
House Natural Resources Committee reported out the bill, HR 1769, with
strong bipartisan support on February 24, 2010. The Senate Energy and
Natural Resources Committee reported out a companion bill on March 2,
2010. The next step is passage on the House and Senate floors.
Solution:
Congress should pass Congressman Reichert's legislation this year.
State
Home | Contact
| ISSUES
| Activities | Archive